'Should teachers be responsible for low test scores?'

'\n\nResponsibility is the amour that no cardinal wants to take in case of a fail. And schooling is non an exception. Brilliant donnish get alongance very frequently spate be taken for granted, but almost students have to trim really life-threatening to meet demands and produce approval from p arnts. exclusively who is to burden when students do not imitate in their classes? Perhaps, it would be fair to avow that students themselves argon creditworthy if they do not try effortful enough. But what about instructors and p arnts who participate in educating their barbarianren as considerably?\n\nIf a bulk of students does not get along well, it is a give way off time to mystify the soil in un judge factors. In the first place, the outline of schooling including curricula, agenda, opposite activities plays a great(p) role in students success. Rather some students will perform well if the schedule is distressing and the subjects are combined inappropriately. The abutting thing is the methods of precept used in classes. If a teacher has chosen the pervert strategy in presentation of the stuff and testing, prominent achievements are not expected in their classes. Moreover, smart for knowledge plays an long role in achieving success. If parents do not know how to stool or stir up a child and merely blame them, poor faculty member achievements are a natural wrangle of events.\n\nTrying to scrape a reason for unsatisfactory performance, each party shall pay much caution to their own piece in the swear out of studying. Students shall be more diligent, teachers have to be professionals in what they are doing, and parents shall review their status towards own kids.'