Descartes And Letters Exchanged Between Elizabeth of Bohemia On the Essay

Descartes And Letters change Between Elizabeth of Bohemia On the Body-Mind Problem - Essay ExampleIn this letter, she appears to suggest that the reason for her departure is the execute of Francois dEspinay (who had courted not only mother but also her younger sister) by Phillipe (her brother) in colossal daylight (Atherton 25). Ironically this act seems to make believe been carried out with Elizabeths knowledge. She tells Descartes that she will carry a draftsmanship of The Passions of the Soul treatise that he had given to her, but remarks that previously his presence had had provided the remedy to her passions, since both his reasoning and maxims had failed to do so. Letter II Descartes to Elizabeth, September 1646. The response to Elizabeth commences with a reference to a correspondence they exchanged belatedly about Machiavellis The Prince Elizabeth had asked him to read it. Descartes remarks that he has discovered in the Prince a lot of precepts which have been rattling levelheaded to him, but his major criticism is that Machiavelli has failed to provide a clear contrast between princes who have acquired power through illegitimate methods and those who have done so through just means. He says that the causality are bereft of solid foundations, and the states they create will inevitably slip into tyranny (Descartes & Griffith 22). Descartes also criticizes Machiavellis arguments concerning the princes relations to enemies, the common people, allies and prominent personalities. He rebukes Machiavellis suggestions that people should feign acquaintance if that is what they have to do in order to satisfy the desires, stating that friendship is something too sacred to abuse in this way. Descartes also take issue with Machiavellis recommendation that the prince should sometimes feel free to lash out promises (Descartes says this would ruin the princes reputation), and insists that the prince should steer clear of the peoples contempt and hatred. In an essential characterization for the interpretation by Regnault, Descartes examines Machiavellis suggestion, in chapter 15, that because the world is corrupt, it is inevitable that one will self-destruct if he forever and a day wants to be a good man, and that when the occasion calls for it a prince must always prepare to be wicked so as to maintain and sustain oneself (Atherton 32). Descartes does not agree with this maxim, unless by a good man Machiavelli means a simple and superstitious man who does not wage war on the Sabbath, and whose conscience can remain clear only when if he changes his peoples religion. However, if by a good man we mean he who relies on his true reasoning for everything he does, then it is open that the best thing is to always try to be good. In response to Princess Elizabeths own dilemmas, Descartes barely recommends that she adopt and put into action those maxims which show that everybodys felicity depends only on him/herself, and that it is very imp ortant to conduct oneself outside the rules and boundaries of fortune so that, while one fails to miss the opportunities to grab the advantages it offers, one does not make him/herself unhappy when it refuses to grant them. Considering that in all earthly affairs there are always reasons for and against, one should mainly focus on those that convince one to approve and sanction what happens (Peursen 28). Letter tercet Elizabeth to Descartes, 10 October 1646. Now settled in Berlin, Elizabeth starts her letter by stating that the